Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dustin Hammit's avatar

Can you point me to the scientific “why” regarding the 6-month benchmark? I’ve looked before and all I can find is “because NAR says so” or “because it is widely accepted”.

In any case I am not convinced that it is the true “balanced market” metric. Using the data series for my MSA at (https://trerc.tamu.edu/data/housing-activity/?data-MSA=Austin-Round+Rock-San+Marcos) the average Months Inventory for every month since 1990 is 3.9 and the Median is 3.85.

I have no clue how this compares to other markets. Frankly I am not a huge fan of aggregating data like real estate that is so region dependent.

In any case, let’s call the Austin benchmark 4-months of supply. We only just crossed north of that in April of this year.

From the front lines I can tell you that yes, SF housing is under pressure. But unless you are high income and can handle a 7 handle mortgage (or are a cash buyer), it is also not exactly a “buyer’s market” either. This very strange interest rate environment has shrunk the pool of both buyers and sellers to create a very constrained market on both sides of a transaction. The only real question is, how long can this last? Also, are labor market fundamentals strong enough, long enough to outlast the Fed’s interest rate/ federal deficit problem?

Expand full comment
David Lentz's avatar

Really find these articles interesting Eric

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts